Telephone Tapping Case: Mumbai’s Colaba Police has filed a chargesheet of about 700 pages within the fort court docket on Tuesday in reference to the cellphone tapping case registered towards IPS officer Rashmi Shukla. On this chargesheet, the police have made many surprising revelations.
In keeping with the chargesheet, the SID official informed in his assertion within the court docket that when he discovered that the cellphone of Shiv Sena chief Sanjay Raut and Eknath Khadse was being tapped within the title of S. Shukla was questioned. However Rashmi mentioned that “I’m the commissioner, if I communicate, then put the quantity on surveillance, then put the quantity 419 on the ability”.
Rashmi Shukla herself used to return to take heed to the recording
The police have mentioned that throughout the investigation they discovered that this cellphone tapping was performed for any political get together or any political particular person. It has been mentioned within the chargesheet that many instances Shukla additionally used to return to take heed to the recording. In keeping with the chargesheet, Sanjay Raut’s cellphone was recorded for 14 days from 7 November to 14 November 2019 and from 18 November to 24 November 2019. On the similar time, two cellphone numbers of Eknath Khadse had been stored on surveillance. His cellphone was stored below surveillance from August 21 to October 17, 2019.
On the similar time, an officer mentioned in his assertion that “In the course of the recording of Sanjay Raut, he discovered that Raut’s quantity used to get calls from his members of the family. There have been additionally some such calls by which he used to speak about going to Sahyadri Visitor Home, Matoshree, Shiv Sena Bhavan and assembly there. On the similar time, within the cellphone recordings of Khadse, conversations between his members of the family had been heard many instances.
Rashmi had accepted the matter of cellphone tapping
This assertion of Rashmi Shukla has additionally been added within the cellphone tapping chargesheet, by which Shukla mentioned that “I don’t bear in mind such previous issues, I had put many telephones on surveillance for the safety of the state. I didn’t do cellphone tapping for a specific particular person of any political get together, however did what I needed to do in accordance with the foundations in view of safety.
Other than this, talking on cellphone tapping, Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut mentioned that “somebody informed me that my cellphone has been stored on tapping. Regardless of this, I by no means modified my cellphone quantity. I’ve by no means performed a unsuitable factor, so how can I be afraid? I used to name the identical quantity even after alerting me.